, pub-4214183376442067, DIRECT, f08c47fec0942fa0
19.6 C
New York
Tuesday, June 6, 2023

Monosynaptic trans-collicular pathways hyperlink mouse whisker circuits to combine somatosensory and motor cortical indicators


The superior colliculus (SC), a conserved midbrain node with in depth long-range connectivity all through the mind, is a key construction for innate behaviors. Descending cortical pathways are more and more acknowledged as central management factors for SC-mediated behaviors, however how cortico-collicular pathways coordinate SC exercise on the mobile degree is poorly understood. Furthermore, regardless of the recognized position of the SC as a multisensory integrator, the involvement of the SC within the somatosensory system is basically unexplored compared to its involvement within the visible and auditory methods. Right here, we mapped the connectivity of the whisker-sensitive area of the SC in mice with trans-synaptic and intersectional tracing instruments and in vivo electrophysiology. The outcomes reveal a novel trans-collicular connectivity motif wherein neurons in motor- and somatosensory cortices impinge onto the brainstem-SC-brainstem sensory-motor arc and onto SC-midbrain output pathways by way of just one synapse within the SC. Intersectional approaches and optogenetically assisted connectivity quantifications in vivo reveal convergence of motor and somatosensory cortical enter on particular person SC neurons, offering a brand new framework for sensory-motor integration within the SC. Greater than a 3rd of the cortical recipient neurons within the whisker SC are GABAergic neurons, which embody a hitherto unknown inhabitants of GABAergic projection neurons concentrating on thalamic nuclei and the zona incerta. These outcomes pinpoint a whisker area within the SC of mice as a node for the combination of somatosensory and motor cortical indicators by way of parallel excitatory and inhibitory trans-collicular pathways, which hyperlink cortical and subcortical whisker circuits for somato-motor integration.


The superior colliculus (SC) is a part of a phylogenetically historical mind community that directs fast motor actions in response to ascending sensory indicators [1,2]. As such, the SC is a central hub for a number of sensory-motor arcs linking sensory data to motor actions. From an evolutionary perspective, a lot of the SC’s operate in mammalian brains has been taken over by the neocortex, by way of parallel, cortically managed sensory-motor arcs [3]. Intriguingly, latest work within the visible and auditory methods show that SC-mediated behaviors are modulated by cortical inputs [46], elevating the query of how cortex- and SC-mediated sensory-motor arcs work together to arrange fascinating conduct. Extra particularly, it isn’t properly understood how cortico-collicular pathways interact with SC microcircuitry and, in flip, generate SC output indicators to the brainstem and diencephalon (together with thalamus). This data is important not solely to grasp how cortico-collicular pathways could coordinate between the “new” cortical and the “outdated” collicular arcs, but in addition to reply principal questions in regards to the id of cortical-recipient (i.e., focused by cortex)–SC neurons: to the place do they undertaking, are they excitatory or inhibitory, and do they obtain sensory and/or motor indicators? SC circuits have principally been studied in relation to imaginative and prescient [2,68], i.e., taking a look at features of the “visible SC.” In distinction, somatosensory features of the SC are much less studied and fewer understood, though somatosensory features akin to whisker sensation are very important for rodents and different animals [912]. This examine got down to handle the involvement of “somatosensory SC” circuits within the whisker system and targeted on 3 principal questions in regards to the group of trans-collicular pathways that mediate cortical enter to SC downstream targets (Fig 1).

(1) To the place do cortical-recipient SC neurons undertaking? Cortico-collicular indicators could also be routed on to SC downstream targets (i.e., within the diencephalon and brainstem) by way of monosynaptic trans-collicular pathways and/or extra not directly, by way of intracollicular connections to SC output neurons [2] (Fig 1, left panel). Whereas intracollicular circuits are properly described [13], proof for monosynaptic trans-collicular pathways is restricted as a result of comparatively few research have delineated the exact enter–output connectivity of outlined subpopulations in SC [2,14]. Certainly, enter–output connectivity of the SC is generally thought of on the degree of SC layers [2,15] and radial cortico-collicular enter zones [16]. Nevertheless, these mesoscopic modules comprise intermingled populations of enter and output neurons in addition to enter neurons with totally different enter identities [1618], for instance, retinal and cortical inputs [19]. Subsequently, dissection of input-defined cell varieties and evaluation of their outputs is essential to unambiguously hyperlink particular SC enter pathways to particular SC downstream targets and to find out whether or not cortical enter indicators may be reworked immediately into SC output to downstream SC goal circuits.

(2) Are cortical-recipient SC neurons excitatory or inhibitory? The SC contains excitatory and inhibitory neurons; for instance, within the visible SC, roughly one-third of the neurons are GABAergic [15,20]. Nevertheless, little or no is understood about GABAergic neurons within the somatosensory SC (Fig 1, middle panel), together with their proportions, their inputs and outputs, and whether or not they’re traditional native interneurons or projections neurons. Figuring out how cortical pathways interact particular excitatory or inhibitory SC circuits and figuring out which downstream pathways emanate from these circuits is indispensable to make circuit-mechanistic predictions about lately found top-down modulation of SC-mediated innate escape and protection behaviors [46].

(3) Do pathways from motor and somatosensory cortices converge on the degree of particular person SC neurons? The multisensory nature of the SC has motivated a big physique of research demonstrating the combination of visible, auditory, somatosensory, and motor indicators within the SC [17,18,2125]. However, whether or not sensory and motor cortex pathways converge in particular person SC neurons stays untested (Fig 1, proper panel). The lateral SC (LSC) has been recognized as a putative level of convergence of somatosensory and motor cortical efferents [16], making it a promising goal to check this speculation.

Right here, we mapped the enter–output connectivity of the mouse SC on the single-cell degree with trans-synaptic tracing, intersectional viral approaches, and optogenetic-assisted electrophysiology. In awake animals, we determine a whisker-sensitive area within the SC, which receives trigeminal and cortico-collicular enter from motor and somatosensory cortex. We then focused particular subsets of input-defined pathways from the brainstem and motor and somatosensory cortices to the SC and traced their axonal outputs to downstream targets, revealing direct trans-collicular pathways, which offer disynaptic long-range hyperlinks between cortical pathways and SC goal areas. Trans-synaptic labeling together with optogenetic enter mapping reveals long-range enter convergence on the extent of particular person SC neurons, with roughly one-third of the cortical recipient SC neurons receiving convergent enter from each motor and somatosensory cortex. We discover that long-range enter pathways extensively goal inhibitory SC neurons, which, in flip, give rise to long-range GABAergic projections to thalamic nuclei and the zona incerta (ZI). In sum, this examine pinpoints a “whisker SC,” wherein converging cortical and brainstem inputs innervate GABAergic and non-GABAergic SC neurons, which, in flip, present parallel trans-collicular pathways to downstream whisker circuits within the diencephalon and brainstem. These outcomes counsel that this cortical management of SC immediately impacts the brainstem-SC-brainstem sensory-motor arc, in addition to the outputs from SC to diencephalic stations.


The whisker-sensitive LSC receives enter from the motor cortex and barrel cortex and from the brainstem

In awake mice, we examined neuronal responses to whisker deflections by concentrating on silicon probes to totally different areas within the lateral SC (Fig 2A and 2B), which has been proven in anesthetized animals to be whisker delicate [26]. Whisker deflections have been induced with an airpuff to whiskers contralateral to the recording websites. We discovered a various diploma of whisker-modulated collicular neurons throughout 12 recordings from 8 mice with roughly 30% of the items with important modulation (325/1,005 items modulated, 302/325 optimistic, 23/325 destructive; Figs 2C and S10, respectively). Whisker responses have been clearly bimodal, with quick and sluggish elements equivalent to “trigeminotectal” and “corticotectal” SC drive, respectively [25]. The areas of the probes have been decided by submit hoc localization of dye alternative. To visualise the situation of whisker-sensitive items within the LSC, we then pooled and mapped all recorded items onto LSC outlines in coordinate house and computed their modulation indices (Fig 2C).

Having recognized the whisker-sensitive area within the LSC, we subsequent wished to find out the long-range inputs to that area. To take action, we focused a retrograde virus (rAAV-ChR2-tdTomato; [29,30], Fig 3A) to the whisker-sensitive area in LSC, based mostly on stereotaxic coordinates estimated from the recordings (Fig 2). LSC-projecting neurons have been present in a number of cortical and subcortical areas (Fig 3B), together with whisker-related areas within the ipsilateral whisker motor cortex (MC), within the barrel cortex (BC), and within the contralateral trigeminal advanced within the brainstem (Bs), (Fig 3C–3E; whisker motor cortex [31] MC: M1 and M2; see S1 Fig). Along with these whisker-related projections to SC, we discovered SC-projecting neurons within the auditory, insular, and ectorhinal cortices as described earlier than [16].


Fig 3. The whisker-sensitive LSC receives projections from whisker-related cortical and brainstem areas.

(A) Higher: Retrograde viral labeling of LSC-projecting neurons: rAAV-tdTomato (purple) injection into LSC (Ntsr1-ChR2-EYFP mouse line). Decrease: Instance pictures of injection website in LSC (purple). (B) Consecutive fluorescent pictures (rostral to caudal) of labeled LSC-projection areas, together with ipsilateral MC and BC, and contralateral Sp5 within the trigeminal advanced. Insets present L5 neurons in MC and BC at larger magnification. (C) Fluorescence pictures of MC and BC (coronal slices) displaying LSC-projecting neurons in layer 5 (purple, TdTomato) relative to genetically recognized layer 6 neurons (inexperienced, Ntsr1-EYFP line). (D) Depth and laminar distributions of LSC-projecting neurons in MC and BC. Crimson dots depict the soma depths of LSC-projecting neurons (relative to pia = 0 μm, MC: median depth −741, IQR = 272 μm; BC: median depth = −648, IQR = 71 μm). Depth-resolved soma densities (black strong traces) are proven relative to layer borders and WM (dashed horizontal traces, estimated based mostly on DAPI indicators). Actual N in S2 Desk. (E) LSC-projecting neurons (purple, Td-Tomato) within the contralateral brainstem are situated within the Sp5. The info for Fig 3D may be discovered at: . AuD, auditory cortex; BC, barrel cortex; Bs, brainstem; Cg, cingulate cortex; Ect, ectorhinal cortex; icp, inferior cerebellar peduncle; Ins, insular cortex; IQR, interquartile vary; MC, motor cortex; PCRtA, parvocelullar reticular nucleus alpha portion; Rs, retrosplenial cortex; S1, major somatosensory cortex; S2, secondary somatosensory cortex; sp5, spinal trigeminal tract; Sp5, spinal trigeminal nucleus; WM, white matter; 4V, fourth ventricle; 7N, facial nucleus.

The laminar profiles of LSC-projecting neurons in MC and BC illustrate that in each cortices, cortico-collicular neurons originate in layer 5 (L5) (Fig 3C and 3D). The L5 origin of cortico-collicular projections was additional confirmed by registering LSC-projecting somata with layer 6 (L6)-specific EYFP fluorescence within the Ntsr1-EYFP reporter mouse line, displaying segregation of those 2 subcortical projection neuron varieties (Fig 3C). Furthermore, virus-mediated labeling of cortical boutons revealed dense innervation of LSC by MC and BC, with reasonably sized cortico-collicular boutons (median diameters: BC 1.15 μm, MC 1.38 μm; S2 Fig), in step with latest experiences [32,33]. In abstract, the whisker-sensitive area of the LSC receives direct and dense enter from whisker areas within the brainstem and from L5 neurons within the barrel and motor cortices.

Mobile group of somatosensory and motor pathways within the lateral SC

We subsequent sought to immediately goal MC-, BC-, and Bs-recipient neurons (RNs) within the LSC to review their group, mobile id, and projection patterns. To take action, we employed a trans-synaptic anterograde strategy, which relies on the flexibility of the AAV1 serotype to trans-synaptically leap to postsynaptic neurons [4]. We injected AAV1-Cre together with AAV2-DIO-mCherry into MC, BC, and Bs to concurrently label the injection websites and their axonal projections with mCherry (purple) and to precise cre within the synaptically related postsynaptic goal neurons in LSC. Lastly, Cre-expressing RNs have been revealed by injecting AAV2-DIO-EGFP into LSC (inexperienced) (Figs 4A, 4B, S3 and S9). This technique allowed us to visualise and reconstruct the three RN populations (MC-RNs, 6 mice; BC-RNs, 6 mice; Bs-RNs, 7 mice) and register them to straightforward anatomical borders inside SC. This revealed that the three whisker-related enter pathways predominantly goal neurons within the intermediate layer of the LSC (Fig 4C). The RN varieties largely overlap alongside the antero-posterior axis (Fig 4D) however are extra segregated within the dorsal-ventral and medial-lateral dimensions. Right here, the group reveals a lateral Bs-recipient zone, adjoining to a medial cortical-recipient zone with appreciable overlap between MC- and BC-RNs (Fig 4E and 4F). We overlaid these recipient zones on the approximate outlines of the radial zones decided by Benavidez and colleagues [16]. The comparability reveals that recipient zones fall into the radial zones as follows: BS → lateral / centrolateral; BC → centrolateral; MC → centrolateral / centromedial (Fig 4E).


Fig 4. Whisker-related sensory-motor RNs are organized into overlapping zones inside the intermediate layer the LSC.

(A) Trans-synaptic labeling of MC-, BC-, and Bs-RNs in SC (left). Cocktails of AAV1-Cre + AAV-DIO-mCherry have been injected into projecting websites (MC, BC, or Bs) and AAV2-DIO-EGFP in SC. Instance fluorescent footage (proper) of mCherry expression (purple) within the projecting websites. (B) High left: Schematic of trans-synaptically labeled RNs (inexperienced). High proper: Instance confocal picture of SC displaying mCherry-expressing BC axons (purple) and Cre-dependent expression of EGFP in BC-RNs (inexperienced). Backside: Fluorescent pictures of EGFP expression (inexperienced) in MC-, BC-, and Bs- RNs. (C) Instance reconstructions of the three RN populations alongside the rostro-caudal axis (purple: MC-RNs; blue: BC-RNs; inexperienced: Bs-RNs), registered to straightforward anatomical borders inside SC. (D) Anterior–posterior distributions of RNs. Information factors present imply RN counts per 100 μm bin (purple: MC-RNs, 6 mice; blue: BC-RNs, 6 mice; inexperienced: Bs-RNs, 7 mice) normalized to their most depend. Field plots present medians (line in field) and IQRs (first to 3rd quartile) in mm (bins), ([median, Q1, Q3 in mm] MC-RNs: 3.58, 3.38, 3.88; BC-RNs: 3.68, 3.48, 3.88; Bs-RNs: 3.68, 3.48, 3.88). (E) Comparability of recipient zones within the DV and ML dimensions in SC. Fluorescent thresholded consultant slices of every RN inhabitants, registered at an analogous AP coordinate and to approximate radial SC zones in response to [16]. (Centroids: [DV, ML, μm] MC: 1,123, 1,505; BC: 1,035, 1,297; Bs: 1,276, 993). (F) Colabeling experiment of cortical (purple, MC-RNs + BC-RNs) and Bs-RNs (inexperienced). High proper: Instance fluorescent picture displaying cortical and peripheral RNs. Center: Fluorescence thresholded RN indicators from 15 consecutive pictures (1 mind). Backside: Histograms present the thresholded pixel grey worth likelihood for cortical-RNs and Bs-RNs within the DV axis and within the ML axis. ([DV, median and IQR, relative to SC dorsal surface] Cortical-RN [μm]: 1,115, 147; Bs-RN: 1,365, 281; [ML, median and IQR, μm relative to SC midline] Cortical-RN: 1,472, 211; Bs-RN: 1,637, 287, p < 0.001). * represents p < 0.01; D: Kruskal–Wallis, F: Wilcoxon rank-sum; precise p-values in S1 Desk, precise N in S2 Desk. Information are proven as imply ± SEM. The info for Fig 4D–4F may be discovered at: . BC, barrel cortex; Bs, brainstem; DV, dorsal-ventral; icp, inferior cerebellar peduncle; IQR, interquartile vary; LSC, lateral SC; LV, lateral ventricle; MC, motor cortex; ML, medial-lateral; Pia, pia mater; RN, recipient neuron; SC.m, medial superior colliculus;, superior colliculus centromedial;, centrolateral superior colliculus; SC.l, lateral superior colliculus; sp5, spinal trigeminal tract; Sp5, spinal trigeminal nucleus; WM, white matter; 7N, facial nucleus.

Collectively, the anterograde and retrograde tracing experiments determine a area inside the intermediate layers of the LSC, which spans roughly 1.2 mm within the rostro-caudal axis (roughly 85% of SC’s extent) and which receives enter from primary whisker circuits within the cortex and brainstem. This area is extremely whisker delicate (Fig 2), suggesting that the intermediate layer of the LSC is a “whisker SC” situated ventrally to the “visible SC.”

Cortical and brainstem pathways immediately goal GABAergic neurons within the LSC

Are the neurons focused by cortical and brainstem long-range enter to the LSC excitatory or inhibitory? To handle this query, we first estimated the proportion of GABAergic neurons within the LSC. Utilizing a GAD-GFP mouse, wherein GABAergic neurons specific GFP, we colabeled all neurons utilizing the pan-neuronal marker NeuN-Alexa 647 (Fig 5A) and estimate that roughly 23% of the LSC neurons within the intermediate layer are GABAergic (Figs 5F and S6), which is barely decrease than within the superficial SC (roughly 30%; [15]).


Fig 5. Cortical and brainstem pathways immediately goal GABAergic neurons in LSC.

(A) The proportion of GABAergic neurons within the LSC was decided in a GAD-GFP mouse by calculating the proportion of GFP-expressing neurons (GABA, yellow) and all neurons labeled with pan-neuronal marker NeuN-Alexa 647 (purple). From left to proper: Instance single rostro-caudal part; corresponding fluorescence picture of GFP and NeuN indicators; reconstruction of soma areas; pie chart of GABA/NeuN proportions for this part (84 GABA/384 NeuNs, 21.9%). The proportion for all analyzed sections (n = 30, 10 slices, 1 mind) was 23.1 ± 1.2% (see additionally S6 Fig). (B) Intersectional labeling of RNs and iRNs for every pathway in GAD-cre mice. AAV1-Flpo + AAV-fDIO-mCherry was injected within the projecting websites (MC, BC, and Bs), and AAV8-Con/Fon-EYFP + AAV2-fDIO-mCherry in LSC of GAD-Cre mice to label iRNs and RNs, respectively. (C) High: Schematic of trans-synaptically labeled RNs (purple) and iRNs (inexperienced). Backside: Confocal pictures of BC-iRNs and BC-RNs. (D) Distribution of iRNs and RNs. Left: Instance fluorescence pictures of iRNs and RNs in several SC sections for MC, BC, and Bs pathways, respectively. Proper: Instance reconstructions of MC-, BC-, and Bs-iRN and RN populations alongside the rostro-caudal axis (purple: RNs, yellow: iRNs), registered to straightforward anatomical borders inside SC. (E) Instance for quantification of iRN/RN ratio for the MC-SC pathway. Fluorescence picture, reconstruction, and pie chart abstract of iRNs/RNs proportion (41 iRNs/119 RNs, 34%). (F) Abstract of iRN/RN proportion for all 3 enter pathways (MC purple, BC blue, Bs inexperienced) alongside the rostro-caudal SC axis and GABA/NeuN proportion (gray dashed line). (G) Means and SEMs of iRN/RN proportions and GABA/NeuN for all 3 enter pathways (identical colours as in F); [mean per slice ± SEM, iRN/RN or GABA/NeuN, n mice]; MC: 36.4 ± 2.4%, 2; BC: 35.6 ± 2.4%, 3; Bs: 33.2 ± 1.5%, 3; GABA/NeuN: 23.1% ± 1.2, 1). * represents p < 0.01; Kruskal–Wallis; precise p-values in S1 Desk, precise N values in S2 Desk. Information are proven as imply ± SEM. The info for Fig 5A, 5E and 5F may be discovered at: . BC, barrel cortex; Bs, brainstem; Int, Intermediate layers; LSC, lateral SC; MC, motor cortex; RN, recipient neuron; Sup, Superficial layers.

We then examined for monosynaptic innervation of GABAergic LSC neurons by using a trans-synaptic intersectional technique that allowed us to separate GABAergic RNs (iRNs) from the inhabitants of RNs, for every long-range enter pathway (Fig 5B). In GAD-Cre mice, which specific Cre in GABAergic neurons [34], we injected anterograde virus (AAV1-Flpo) into MC, BC, or Bs, in addition to conditional reporter viruses (AAV-ConFon EYFP, AAV-fDIO mCherry) into LSC. This intersectional strategy differentially labeled RNs with mCherry and iRNs with EYFP, demonstrating direct innervation of GABAergic neurons by MC, BC, and Bs enter pathways (Figs 5C and S4 and S5 for controls). Reconstructions of the two populations present that iRNs and RNs are intermingled for all 3 enter pathways (Fig 5D). Our estimates of the iRN/RN proportions counsel that every pathway targets between 34% and 37% GABAergic neurons alongside the complete extent of the recipient antero-posterior axis (Figs 5E–5G and S11).

In abstract, long-range enter pathways from MC, BC, and Bs extensively goal GABAergic neurons within the LSC. The proportion of iRNs exceeded the proportion of GABAergic neurons (>34% versus 23%; Fig 5G), suggesting a preferential concentrating on for GABAergic neurons by these long-range enter pathways.

Convergence of somatosensory and motor cortex in LSC neurons

The appreciable overlap between recipient zones in LSC noticed in Fig 4 suggests potential convergence of long-range enter pathways on the extent of particular person LSC neurons. To check for monosynaptic enter convergence in single LSC neurons (CVG-RN), we employed an intersectional technique as follows: In the identical mouse, we injected 2 projection websites—for instance, MC and BC—every with a distinct trans-synaptic variant—AAV1-Cre or AAV1-Flpo. Injections of the double-conditional (Cre- and Flpo-dependent) reporter virus in SC certainly revealed CVG-RNs for all 3 pathways (Fig 6A and 6B). MC and Bs convergence is highest within the anterior LSC, whereas MC and BC and BC and Bs convergences peak within the middle and posterior SC, respectively (Fig 6C).


Fig 6. Whisker-related enter pathways converge in subpopulations of LSC neurons.

(A) Left: Concentrating on convergence neurons (CVG-RNs) in LSC. AAV1-Cre + AAV2-DIO-mCherry and AAV1-Flpo + fDIO-mCherry have been injected into 2 projecting websites and AAV8-Con/Fon-EYFP + AAV2-DIO-mCherry into LSC to disclose CVG-RNs and RNs, respectively. Proper: Instance fluorescent pictures of CVG-RNs. (B) Instance reconstructions of CVG-RNs alongside the rostro-caudal axis, registered to straightforward anatomical borders inside SC. (C) Normalized distributions of CVG-RNs alongside the rostro-caudal axis (bin measurement 100 μm). Field plots above present medians (white traces), and IQR (first to 3rd quartile, bins). MC and BC, MC and Bs, BC and Bs n = 4, 3, 2 mice, respectively. (D) Left: Z-scored imply variety of CVG-RNs for every enter pair. Proper: Fold distinction between imply variety of CVG-RNs per 100 μm bin for cortex-cortex (4 mice) and brainstem-cortex (5 mice). (E) Proportions of CVG-RNs to RNs for every convergence enter pair. Field plots present the median (line in field), imply (sq. in field), and IQR (first to 3rd quartile, bins). ([median, mean, IQR] MC and BC: 0.20, 0.22, 0.01; BC and Bs: 0.08, 0.01, 0.09; MC and Bs: 0.09, 0.01, 0.06). (F) The 2-component Gaussian Combination Mannequin reveals the realm of MC and BC convergence zone within the intermediate layer of the LSC (11 slices, 2 mice, 222 neurons). The black dot signifies the situation of the best likelihood of discovering MC and BC CVG-RNs (1,126 μm from SC floor and 1,492 μm from the midline). * represents p < 0.01; C, E: Kruskal–Wallis; precise p-values in S1 Desk, precise N in S2 Desk. Information are proven as imply ± SEM. The info for Fig 6C–6F may be discovered at: . BC, barrel cortex; Bs, brainstem; Int, intermediate layer; IQR, interquartile vary; LSC, lateral SC; MC, motor cortex; RN, recipient neuron; SC, superior colliculus; Sup, superficial layer.

To quantify the diploma of convergence, we in contrast (1) z-scored imply CVG-RN counts per enter pair and (2) the proportion of CVG-RNs with respect to RNs between all enter pairs. Each analyses revealed that MC and BC convergence stands out in comparison with the opposite convergence pairs. Notably, the z-scored MC and BC CVG-RN estimates a 2.33-fold larger deviation in comparison with Bs and cortex convergence (Fig 6D).

To estimate the proportion of convergence neurons relative to all recipient neurons, we counted mCherry-labeled RNs and EYFP-labeled CVG-RNs (Figs 6A and S12). Cortico-cortical convergence was estimated to be about 2.3-fold larger than brainstem-cortical convergence (roughly 23% CVG-RN for the MC and BC enter pair versus roughly 10% CVG-RN for each the BC and Bs and MC and Bs enter pairs) (Fig 6E). Becoming a two-component Gaussian Combination Mannequin to the coordinates of MC and BC CVG-RNs localized the cortico-cortical convergence zone to the dorsal portion of the intermediate layer (Fig 6F).

Thus, motor and barrel cortex pathways converge on single neurons within the LSC, highlighting the whisker SC as a node for the combination of somatosensory and motor cortical indicators. This convergence motif might doubtlessly help quick, temporally exact integration of indicators from totally different cortical areas; due to this fact, we subsequent examined this risk on the useful degree.

Single LSC items combine sensory- and motor cortex inputs

To validate useful convergence of MC and BC in LSC, we made electrophysiological recordings in LSC together with optogenetic stimulation of L5 neurons in MC and BC in anesthetized mice. We used Rbp4-Cre-ChR2-EYFP mice (n = 4), wherein L5 neurons specific ChR2 [35,36] and successively stimulated MC-L5 and BC-L5 throughout the identical experiment through the use of a movable fiber optic positioned above the pial floor (Fig 7A).

By characterizing the spiking exercise of particular person SC items in response to successive optogenetic stimulation of L5 in MC or BC (Fig 7B), we recognized 30 items that responded to both MC-L5 or BC-L5, from which 9 responded to each (Fig 7C). Unit spike latencies in response to optogenetic stimulation of L5 have been roughly 9 to 12 ms (Fig 7D, precise values in S3 Desk), similar to the latencies of optogenetically evoked spiking in L5 and L5-innervated downstream neurons within the thalamus [37,38], suggesting monosynaptic activation of LSC neurons by way of L5-SC synapses.

Thus, along with the anatomical tracing, these outcomes present that the LSC integrates twin useful enter from each motor and barrel cortex layer 5 neurons in a subpopulation of about 20% to 30% of the recipient neurons.

Trans-collicular pathways by way of cortico- and trigemino-collicular projections to the diencephalon and brainstem

It’s not recognized whether or not cortico-collicular indicators may be routed on to LSC downstream targets by way of monosynaptic trans-collicular pathways. If so, cortico-collicular enter neurons within the LSC could be required to kind long-range pathways that depart the SC. To check this risk, we leveraged the trans-synaptic labeling strategy to seek for axonal indicators from RN labeling experiments (3 mice) all through the mind. Certainly, we noticed plentiful RN axons and varicosities in a number of goal areas within the brainstem and diencephalon (reconstructions in Fig 8A; excessive magnification examples in S7 Fig).


Fig 8. Trans-collicular pathways by way of cortico- and trigemino-collicular projections to the diencephalon and brainstem.

(A) Instance axon reconstructions of MC-, BC-, and Bs-RNs in diencephalic (left) and brainstem nuclei (proper) goal nuclei. (B) RN output maps computed from normalized RACs alongside the rostro-caudal axis for all 3 RN pathways and their diencephalic (left) and brainstem (proper) goal nuclei. Crimson and blue point out excessive or low RAC values, respectively. Bar plots summarize Z-scored axon counts for every goal nucleus, normalized to the utmost axon depend in every pathway. Stippled line signifies Z-score = 0, n = 3 mice; see Supplies and strategies for particulars. (C) Instance confocal pictures (desaturated and inverted) of axons from MC-, BC-, and Bs-iRN within the diencephalon. Inset pictures at a better magnification present varicosities (white arrowheads, scale bar 5 μm). See S7 Fig for larger magnification pictures. The info for Fig 8B may be discovered at: . APT, anterior pretectal nucleus; CL, central lateral nucleus; CM, central medial nucleus; DLG, dorsolateral geniculate nucleus; ETH, ethmoidal nucleus; LD, laterodorsal nucleus; LP, lateral posterior nucleus; MD, mediodorsal nucleus; PAG, periaqueductal grey; PC, paracentral nucleus; PF, parafascicular nucleus; PO, posterior nucleus; PR, prerubral discipline; PRC, precommissural nucleus; PV, paraventricular nucleus; RAC, relative axon depend; Re, Reuniens nucleus; RH, rhomboid nucleus; SCP, superior cerebellar peduncle; STH, subthalamic nucleus; VM, ventromedial nucleus; VPM, ventral posteromedial nucleus; ZI, zona incerta.

To estimate relative innervation strengths of the goal nuclei, we computed RN-output maps from reconstructed axon counts (Fig 8B) to visualise comparatively enriched or sparse innervation. All 3 trans-collicular pathways innervated a number of diencephalic nuclei, with the best axonal density in ZI and sensory-motor–associated nuclei within the thalamus, i.e., the posterior (PO), ventro-medial (VM) and parafascicular (PF) nuclei. Within the brainstem, the strongest innervation was discovered within the pontine reticular (PnC; caudal half), the gigantocellular reticular (Gi), and the facial nucleus (7N). The innervation power of a given goal was typically related for the three trans-collicular pathways, notably for brainstem targets. The output maps differed extra strongly within the thalamus, for instance, within the lateral-posterior nucleus (LP), which acquired comparatively enriched innervation by Bs-RN axons.

We subsequent analyzed the inhibitory RN pathways and requested in the event that they solely resemble traditional interneurons, which solely undertaking inside intracollicular circuits, or if additionally they give rise to long-range projections exterior the SC (GABAergic projection neurons). Unexpectedly, we discovered that iRNs from all 3 pathways give rise to excessive density innervation of the ZI in addition to projections to PO and PF (Figs 8C and S8). In distinction, no iRN projections have been discovered within the brainstem. Thus, trans-collicular pathways prolong to long-range GABAergic output with hitherto unknown inhibitory features in thalamic nuclei and the ZI. Primarily based on the noticed axonal projections, each RNs and iRNs innervate the dorsal and ventral ZI (Figs 8A, 8C, S7A, S7B, S8A and S8B). Because the ZI is a primary supply of GABAergic projections to higher-order thalamus [39], this connectivity motif suggests inhibitory and disinhibitory gate management of higher-order thalamus by way of RN and iRN pathways, respectively.

In abstract, we discovered excitatory and inhibitory monosynaptic trans-collicular pathways (Fig 9), suggesting that at the least a part of the enter indicators from cortex and brainstem are immediately reworked into SC output to quickly route cortical and brainstem data to various factors alongside the neural axis.


Trans-collicular pathways

The superior colliculus—a extremely conserved sensory-motor construction in vertebrates—is claimed to be one of many best-characterized buildings within the mind [2,14,15]. Nevertheless, exact understanding of how specific enter pathways to the SC are synaptically related to specific SC output targets has been hampered as a result of lack of instruments to find out the connectivity options of input-defined SC neurons. Furthermore, such anatomical constraints are essential to develop useful predictions and testable hypotheses for sensory-motor computations within the SC and, in a broader context, to grasp how cortex-mediated and SC-mediated sensory-motor arcs relate to one another.

The current examine elucidated the enter–output group of the mouse LSC by tracing input-defined pathways from the brainstem and motor and somatosensory cortices to the LSC and additional on to collicular downstream targets within the diencephalon and brainstem (Fig 9). We thereby recognized a connectivity scheme with important implications for collicular computations: trans-collicular pathways, monosynaptically traversing by the LSC and immediately linking cortical and brainstem whisker circuits to downstream targets within the brainstem and diencephalon. The connectivity scheme adopted by these trans-collicular neurons differs from that present in different layered circuits—for instance, in comparison with the canonical circuit framework of the cortex, wherein layer 4 neurons are thought of enter neurons that kind solely intracortical connections. In distinction, the SC enter neurons recognized right here immediately present long-range output axons to a number of subcortical targets, suggesting that at the least a part of the enter indicators are immediately reworked into SC output by way of trans-collicular pathways.

In awake animals, we discovered that single neurons within the intermediate layer of the LSC are extremely delicate to whisker stimulation, in accordance with earlier work in anesthetized rodents that confirmed whisker sensitivity within the LSC [26] and trigeminal and cortical enter from the somatosensory barrel and motor cortex [16,25]. Our outcomes develop on this work by demonstrating that the whisker-sensitive LSC is densely interconnected with whisker circuits all through the mind, each when it comes to inputs and outputs, collectively suggesting that the intermediate layer of the LSC serves as a whisker SC.

The microanatomical analyses and mapping information we current right here enable a number of useful predictions for whisking conduct. Firstly, we discovered that brainstem long-range inputs to the LSC flip into direct excitatory outputs to the 7N, a brainstem motor nucleus for whisker actions [40]. This discovering predicts a brief sensory-motor loop that would mediate the “minimal impingement” phenomenon, which animals use to optimize tactile sensitivity by minimizing the pressure of tactile sensors upon floor contact [41]. Our information counsel that whisker contact indicators ascending from the brainstem trigeminal nucleus to the LSC are monosynaptically reworked into motor output indicators to the 7N, as a direct sensory-motor loop to stabilize whisker motion pressure, whereas animals transfer relative to things.

Moreover, within the thalamus, the three investigated trans-collicular pathways from MC, BC, and Bs goal higher-order thalamic nuclei, akin to PO, however not first-order thalamic nuclei (Fig 8). This discovering is especially related for higher-order thalamic computations of cortical indicators as a result of it suggests parallel entry routes of cortical L5 indicators to the higher-order thalamus: an oblique L5 trans-collicular pathway and a direct cortico-thalamic pathway [33,4244].

One other important end result of our mapping information is the hyperlink between the whisker and the visible system: whisker trigemino-collicular pathways ship plentiful projections to the visible LP—the rodent pulvinar within the thalamus (Fig 8). This consequence offers an anatomical substrate for the latest discovering that the LP integrates visible and tactile data [45]. The combination of trans-collicular whisker indicators within the LP could also be an essential mechanism underlying visuo-tactile features akin to looking conduct, wherein the SC has been proven to play a key position [8].

Lengthy-range enter convergence within the LSC

The multimodal nature of the SC is properly established and useful observations of multisensory SC neurons [18] constantly help multimodal convergence within the SC. Nevertheless, solely few research immediately demonstrated long-range convergence on the degree of particular person SC neurons utilizing anatomical means [19,46,47], and, to the perfect of our information, the potential for particular convergence between motor and sensory cortical pathways within the SC had not but been examined. Utilizing anatomical and useful instruments to check convergence of enter pathways from MC, BC, and Bs in particular person LSC neurons, we discovered subpopulations of LSC neurons, receiving monosynaptic enter from 2 enter pathways. Whereas the estimated proportion of brainstem-cortical convergence neurons was roughly 10%, the proportion of cortico-cortical convergence neurons (MC and BC) was greater than twice as excessive (roughly 23%). We show that convergence between motor and sensory cortex is useful by displaying that roughly 30% of the person LSC items receiving useful cortical enter are attentive to optogenetic stimulation of L5 neurons in each MC and BC.

The combination of convergent L5 indicators from sensory and motor cortices by single SC neurons suggests a low-level neuronal substrate for sensory-motor integration within the SC from which useful predictions within the context of the execution and management of motor plans [24] may be derived. On this framework, inputs from MC inform the SC about an meant motor motion, i.e., an “efference copy” of the motor command [48], whereas BC offers data on the ensuing sensory standing, thereby enabling mechanisms to provoke small motor command readjustments and/or context-dependent dampening or enhancement of sensation, probably analogous to the SC mechanisms proposed for the stabilization of visible notion [49]. Nevertheless within the context of this proposition, it additionally must be famous that L5 neurons of each S1 and M1 convey motor-related indicators, i.e., aren’t totally unbiased [31,50].

Lengthy-range innervation of GABA neurons within the LSC

The SC incorporates substantial populations of GABAergic neurons with reported numbers starting from 30% to 45% [15]. We estimate that the LSC incorporates roughly 23% GABAergic neurons. Relatively unexpectedly, we discovered that GABAergic neurons are immediately innervated by long-range pathways from MC, BC, and Bs. Apparently, the estimated proportion of innervated GABAergic neurons was between 34% and 37% and thereby considerably exceeded the estimated proportion of GABAergic neurons within the LSC (roughly 23%), suggesting an essential useful position for the recruitment of inhibitory SC-circuits by cortical and brainstem long-range inputs. Moreover, a latest report utilizing anterograde trans-synaptic viral tracing discovered that almost half of the SC neurons downstream of the secondary motor cortex are GABAergic [24]. Collectively, these findings counsel that the twin recruitment of inhibitory and excitatory circuits within the SC offers cortico-collicular pathways with the flexibility to flexibly dampen or improve SC-mediated innate behaviors.

Our mapping information show that the populations of focused GABAergic neurons include projection neurons. Notably, these GABAergic projections goal PO and the ZI however not the brainstem. Thus, the PO and the ZI, the latter of which is a potent supply of inhibition for higher-order thalamic nuclei [51], obtain each GABAergic and non-GABAergic trans-collicular enter, due to this fact predicting bidirectional management of those LSC targets. Future investigations of how the ZI is modulated by whisker indicators from parallel GABAergic and non-GABAergic trans-collicular pathways will doubtless generate substantial perception into the position of whisking on ZI’s myriad features, which embody locomotion, feeding, looking, ache regulation, and protection behaviors [7,8].

What’s the relation between the “older” collicular and the “newer” cortical arcs of sensory-motor loops? Within the mammalian mind, wherein each arcs are densely interconnected [52], and as prompt by the current examine, one potential distinguishing operate is the first foci of their corresponding “brain-world” loops: self-motion for SC-mediated loops and exterior objects for cortical-mediated loops. Nevertheless, it must also be famous that the mammalian SC maintains a direct leg to exterior sensory indicators (for instance, the brainstem inputs described right here) upon which fast motor actions can probably be computed independently of the cortex. The cortex could thus present a dynamic interference conduit to those SC-generated sensory-motor features to reinforce behavioral flexibility—for instance, by “vetoing” SC-mediated behaviors by way of selective recruitment of the GABAergic pathways depicted in Fig 9. Attaining a useful understanding of the interactions between cortical and collicular sensory-motor loops is a useful problem for the longer term.

Supplies and strategies

Virus-mediated labeling and intersectional methods

Retrograde labeling: To determine enter areas to the LSC (Fig 3A), we focused the retrograde rAAV-TdTomato [30] into the whisker-sensitive area of the LSC (Fig 2). To delineate SC projection neurons (Td-Tomato) from L6 neurons, these injections have been carried out in Ntsr1-EYFP mice, wherein L6 however not L5 neurons specific EYFP [54,55].

Cortico-collicular bouton labeling: To label MC and BC boutons in SC, we injected AAV1/2-CAG-SyPhy-EGFP and AAV1/2-CBA-SyPhy-mOrange [44] into the cortical projection websites (BC and MC, respectively) in the identical animal (S2A Fig). The diameters of synaptic boutons labeled with Synaptophysin-EGFP and Synaptophysin-mOrange in SC have been measured as maximal projection space [32,56] from confocal microscopy pictures utilizing an A1+ microscope and NIS parts (Heidelberg Nikon Imaging Middle).

Trans-synaptic anterograde and intersectional labeling: To label input-defined recipient neurons, we made use of the flexibility of AAV1-Cre and AAV1-Flpo particles to leap to postsynaptic neurons by way of vesicle launch [4,57,58]. We adopted this technique to reveal totally different subsets of SC neurons outlined by their monosynaptic enter from whisker-related projection websites of curiosity (MC, BC, Bs) and to characterize intersections between overlapping cell populations, through the use of totally different combos of anterograde and reporter viruses (Desk 2). For instance, the RNs include a subpopulation of inhibitory neurons (iRNs), and we make use of intersectional approaches based mostly on the differential labeling of neurons, which fulfill totally different circumstances. For RNs to be labeled, they should obtain enter from an space of curiosity (for instance, BC). For the iRNs to be labeled in a distinct colour, they should fulfill each, the earlier situation, AND the extra situation to precise cre (from the GAD-Cre line). We used the next methods to label: (1) Recipient neurons (RNs); (2) Cortical and brainstem RNs; (3) Recipient inhibitory neurons (iRNs); and (4) Convergence neurons (CVG-RNs) as follows:

  1. 1. Recipient neurons (RNs): Cocktails of AAV1-Cre (trans-synaptic) + AAV2-DIO-mCherry (1:1) have been injected into the projection websites of curiosity (MC, BC, Bs) in separate mice. A second injection of the Cre reporter virus AAV2-DIO-EGFP was focused to SC to disclose RNs (Fig 4A).
  2. 2. Cortical and brainstem RNs: Identical as RN however injecting MC and BC in the identical mouse with a cocktail of AAV1-Flpo + AAV2-fDIO-mCherry (1:1), and Bs with a cocktail of AAV1-Cre + AAV2-DIO-EGFP (1:1). SC was injected with a cocktail of AAV2-fDIO-mCherry + AAV2-DIO-EGFP (1:1) to disclose cortical and brainstem RNs in several colours (Fig 4F).
  3. 3. Inhibitory recipient neurons (iRNs): Identical as RN strategy however in GAD-Cre mice [34] (Fig 5B), utilizing a cocktail of AAV1-Flpo + AAV2-fDIO-mCherry (1:1) for the projection websites of curiosity (MC, BC, Bs). SC was focused with a cocktail of AAV8-Con/Fon-EYFP and AAV2-fDIO-mCherry (1:1). AAV8-Con/Fon-EYFP serves as a reporter virus to precise EGFP when Cre and Flpo recombinases are coexpressed and thus labels iRNs, whereas AAV2-fDIO-mCherry labels RNs.
  4. 4. Convergence neurons (CVG-RNs): AAV1-Flpo + AAV2-fDIO-mCherry (projection website 1) and AAV1-Cre + AAV2-DIO-mCherry (projection website 2) cocktails (1:1) have been injected into wild-type mice, and an AAV8-Con/Fon-EYFP + AAV2-fDIO-mCherry cocktail (1:1) into SC to visualise convergent RNs (EYFP, co-innervated from projection websites 1 + 2; Fig 6A) and RNs (mCherry, innervated from projection website 1 solely). See S5 Fig for controls of the conditional expression methods. Virus expression time was between 28 and 30 days.

Cell counting

Fluorescence picture sequence of SC have been loaded into Fiji and manually rotated to align all slices alongside the midline. From every picture sequence, we chosen the part that matched probably the most rostral a part of SC (AP: −3.08 mm) in Paxinos’ atlas [59], so that each one sequence contained the identical area (AP: −3.08 to −4.28 mm). To pick out probably the most rostral part, we in contrast the form and measurement of the hippocampus, optic tract, anterior pretectal nucleus, medial geniculate nucleus, and SC and its brachium anatomical references towards Paxinos’ −3.08 mm slice. The ensuing SC sequence have been processed in Fiji as follows. First, as a measure of background, we took the common pixel depth of three totally different areas within the non-recipient space and subtracted this common worth from every part within the sequence. Pictures have been then distinction enhanced with an exponential transformation (Fiji “Exp” operate), and brightness was manually restored by scaling depth values by an element between 1.2 and a couple of. Labeled neurons have been detected utilizing Fiji 3D Object Counter with 2 consumer parameters: gray-value threshold and a minimum-size filter, which we set to 30 pixels to exclude non-somatic indicators. The distributions of detected neurons throughout the rostro-caudal (AP) SC axis are proven in 13 bins of 100 μm from −3.08 to −4.28 mm.

To estimate the proportion of GABAergic neurons within the intermediate layer of LSC, confocal picture sequence of double-immunolabeled slices (GAD67 and NeuN) have been analyzed with Fiji’s “Cell Counter” plugin. GAD67- and NeuN-labeled somata have been counted in 3 segments of 200 × 200 μm per picture inside the intermediate layer (n = 10 slices). We excluded marginal slices when the cell quantity didn’t fulfill a minimal N pattern criterion to detect the proportion distinction with a statistical energy of 0.8 β.

In vivo electrophysiological recordings

Awake recordings.

Mice between 8 and 12 weeks (n = 12) have been recorded on a cylindrical treadmill, based mostly on the mannequin established in [60], consisting of a 15-cm diameter foam curler mounted on a {custom} constructed low friction rotary steel axis, hooked up to 2 vertical posts. Previous to whisker stimulation experiments, a head plate was implanted by stereotaxic surgical procedure following the preparation procedures described within the part for viral injections. After exposing the cranium, a small craniotomy was made above the recording website in LSC (AP: −3.6; ML: 1.25 to 1.3; DV: −1.65 to −2.1). A plastic ring was cemented (Paladur, Kulzer, GmbH) across the craniotomy to create a small ringer reservoir for the reference electrode. The properly was lined with silicone elastomer (Kwik-Solid, World Precision Devices) till the experiment. Subsequent, a polycarbonate two-winged head plate was cemented onto the cranium with dental cement (Tremendous-bond, Solar Medical). Habituation started 5 days after the surgical procedure and lasted for 3 days. Animals have been head-fixed on the treadmill equipment with the pinnacle plate. Habituation periods lasted for about 60 min throughout which mice freely walked on the cylindrical treadmill and have been fed sweetened condensed milk as reward. Recording periods have been carried out on the next day and lasted between 20 and 30 min. The protecting silicone was eliminated and silicon probes have been lowered to the SC. Exercise was recorded utilizing an electrophysiology system composed of a multielectrode silicon probe (sharpened ASSY-77 E1, Cambridge Neurotech); a 64-channel amplifier chip (RHD2164) to a USB-2 interface board (RHD-EVAL, Intan Applied sciences, California, US); and indicators have been fed into Bonsai [61] Intan RHD library. Neural exercise was recorded at 30 kHz utilizing a 0.1 Hz to fifteen kHz bandpass filter. The ensuing binary file was fed to Kilosort, a MATLAB-based semi-automated spike-sorting software program [62]. The.bin information and the E1-probe channel map in μm have been enter to Kilosort with the default parameters and the outcomes have been curated with Phy. Single items with <3% refractory interval (1.5 ms) violations and a baseline spike fee >0.1 Hz have been included for subsequent evaluation.

Anesthetized recordings.

Preparations and recordings have been carried out in 8- to 12-week-old Rbp4-Cre-ChR2-EYFP mice (n = 4), which is crossbred between “Rbp4-Cre” × “Ai32” to particularly specific ChR2 in L5 PT neurons [63]. Mice have been anesthetized with a mix of 5% urethane answer (IP, 1.3 g/kg physique weight) and 1% isoflurane in medical diploma oxygen, utilized by way of an inhalator masks. After incision, bregma and lambda have been revealed and aligned utilizing a micro-manipulator (Luigs-and-Neumann) to drill craniotomies above SC (AP: −3.6, ML: 1.3), BC (AP: −1, ML: +3), and MC (AP: +1, ML: +1). SC exercise was recorded utilizing an electrophysiology system composed of a multielectrode silicon probe in AP: −3.6, ML: +1.3 DV: −1.6 to −2 mm (sharpened ASSY-77 E1, Cambridge Neurotech); a 64-channel amplifier chip (RHD2164) to a USB-2 interface board (RHD-EVAL, Intan Applied sciences, California, US); and the Spike2 (model 9.14) recording suite with Intan Talker module (Cambridge Digital Gadgets, Cambridge, UK). Neural exercise was recorded at 30 kHz utilizing a 100 Hz to 10 kHz bandpass filter. The ensuing file (.smrx) was transformed right into a binary file (.bin) to feed it to Kilosort, a MATLAB-based semi-automated spike-sorting software program [62]. The file conversion consisted of studying the channels within the.smrx file, remodeling them into unsigned 16-bit integers (uint16) values from the 16-bit depth analog-to-digital converter (ADC), and writing them right into a.bin file. The.bin information and the E1-probe channel map in μm have been enter to Kilosort with the default parameters, and the outcomes have been curated with Phy. Single items with <3% refractory interval (1.5 ms) violations and a baseline spike fee >0.1 Hz have been included for subsequent evaluation.

Cell responsiveness.

Whisker responses: We thought of a single unit to be whisker responsive if the median spike depend throughout trials inside a 30-ms window (−20 to −50 ms) prestimulus was considerably totally different from the median spike depend inside an identical-length window (20 to 50 ms, α = 5%, two-sample Wilcoxon check). The modulation index (MI) was computed utilizing Cell Explorer [27] as follows: , the place R and C are firing charges within the response and spontaneous home windows, respectively [64]. A given unit might have MI values starting from −1, when R = 0 & C ≠ 0; to 0, when R = C; and to 1, when R ≠ 0 & C = 0.

Optogenetic responses: We thought of 2 equal-length time home windows wherein we counted spikes earlier than the onset of the optogenetic stimulus (spontaneous, −18 to −6 ms) and after the optogenetic stimulus onset (evoked, 6 to 18 ms) for every trial and for every unit. We computed the z-scores of evoked counts utilizing the imply and normal deviation of spontaneous counts and in contrast evoked z-scores towards a 1.96 z-threshold (α = 5%). Trials that crossed the z-threshold have been thought of considerably responsive and have been assigned a logical true worth. We then computed the proportion of responsive (profitable) trials per unit. To be able to state significance for the response proportion, we estimated the required trial quantity (N) to realize a statistical energy of 0.8 with proportion values p and speculation p₀ = 1-p utilizing MATLAB’s check of the “N” parameter (trials) for a binomial distribution (sampsizepwr). For p ≂ 1/3, N ≂ 40, which is our experimental trial quantity. Moreover, we in contrast the unit’s trial crossing proportions with rising thresholds (α = 5%, one-tailed t check, ttest in MATLAB) and visually looked for a area the place the cardinality of included items stabilized. With an rising threshold, the variety of included items decreases till the responsive items could be discovered. We selected p₀ = 1/3 as an optimum inflection level, minimizing the brink and maximizing the responsive unit cardinality.

Supporting data

S1 Fig. LSC-projecting neurons within the MC (M1 and M2).

Associated to Fig 3. (A) Retrograde mCherry-labeled LSC-projecting neurons (purple) within the MC prolong throughout M1 and M2. (B) Greater magnification confocal picture displaying MC LSC-projecting neurons (purple) within the motor cortex from pia to wm. LSC, lateral SC; MC, motor cortex; wm, white matter.


S2 Fig. MC and BC boutons in SC.

Associated to Fig 3. (A) Schematic of twin injections of AAVs encoding for synapse-specific fluorescent fusion proteins (Synaptophysin-mOrange, Synaptophysin-EGFP; [1,2]) to label MC (mOrange) and BC (EYFP) boutons in SC. (B) Instance confocal pictures of coronal SC slices with fluorescently labeled BC (left, synaptophysin-EGFP) and MC (proper, synaptophysin-mOrange) boutons. (C) Instance of upper magnification confocal picture displaying BC boutons within the intermediate layers of SC. (D) Normalized distribution of MC and BC bouton diameters in SC. Boxplots of bouton diameters, median (line in field), IQR (first to 3rd quartile, bins) (BC = 1.15 μm, n = 100; MC = 1.38 μm, n = 44) and IQRs (BC = 0.50 μm; MC = 0.60 μm). * represents p < 0.01; B: Wilcoxon rank sum; precise p-values in S1 Desk. The info for S2D Fig may be discovered at: . BC, barrel cortex; Int, intermediate layer; IQR, interquartile vary; MC, motor cortex; SC, superior colliculus; Sup, superficial layer.


S3 Fig. Trans-synaptic labeling of MC RNs within the intermediate grey and white layers [3], equal to SC intermediate layers.

Associated to Fig 4. (A) SC coronal slice displaying trans-synaptically EGFP-labeled MC-RNs within the intermediate layers of SC with overlaid anatomical borders from Paxinos mouse mind atlas [3]. (B) Identical as (A) at larger magnification. csc, commissure of the superior colliculus; DpG, Deep grey layer; DpWh deep white layer; InG, Intermediate grey layer; InWh, intermediate white layer; MC, motor cortex; Op, optic nerve of the superior colliculus; PAG, periaqueductal grey; RN, recipient neuron; SC, superior colliculus; SuG, superficial grey layer; Zo, Zonal layer.


S4 Fig. GABA immunostaining of Con/Fon labeled cells within the GAD-Cre mouse line.

Associated to Fig 5. Instance experiment wherein MC-iRNs have been labeled by injecting AAV1-Flpo in MC, and AAV8-Con/Fon-EYFP in LSC of GAD-Cre mice. Slices with trans-synaptically labeled iRNs (inexperienced, Confon-EYFP) have been counterstained towards GABA (purple, immunostaining with Alexa 647; see Supplies and strategies). All inspected iRNs have been GABA optimistic. (A) Instance confocal picture displaying iRNs (inexperienced) and GABA immunostain (purple). Left: Overlay of purple and inexperienced channel, displaying GABA-positive iRNs in yellow (arrows). Center: Inexperienced channel, displaying iRNs (inexperienced). Proper: Crimson channel, displaying GABA-positive somata (purple). (B) Identical as in (A) for a distinct iRN at larger magnification. iRN, inhibitory RN; LSC, lateral SC; MC, motor cortex.


S5 Fig. Controls for conditional expression of trans-synaptic reporter viruses in LSC.

Associated to Figs 46. (A) Higher row: Conditional expression of the reporter DIO was examined by injecting AAV2-DIO-mCherry both alone (left) or together with AAV1-Cre (proper) into the LSC. Backside row. Examples of corresponding fluorescence pictures of the LSC. Conditional expression was solely noticed together with AAV1-Cre (proper, purple neurons). No leak expression of the reporter virus was detected. (B) Identical as (A) however for Flpo-dependent reporter virus. No leak expression of the reporter virus was detected. (C) Higher row: Conditional expression of the reporter virus AAV8-Con/Fon-EYFP was examined by LSC injections of AAV8-Con/Fon-EYFP both alone or in several combos with trans-synaptic viruses: AAV1-Cre and AAV1-Flpo. Backside row: Examples of corresponding fluorescence pictures of the LSC. Conditional expression was solely noticed for the final mixture AAV8-Con/Fon-EYFP and AAV1-Cre and AAV1-Flpo (inexperienced neurons); no leak expression of the reporter virus was detected.


S6 Fig. Proportion of GABAergic neurons in intermediate layers of the LSC.

Associated to Fig 5. Proportion of GABAergic GAD67-GFP optimistic neurons with respect to immunostained NeuN neurons within the intermediate layer of the LSC. Utilizing a GAD-GFP mouse line, wherein GABAergic neurons are labeled with GFP, neurons have been counterstained with NeuN-Alexa 647 (Fig 5). The plot reveals the proportion of GABA and NeuN neurons alongside the rostro-caudal LSC axis. The info for S6 Fig may be discovered at:


S7 Fig. Axonal projections and varicosities of MC-RNs in diencephalic and brainstem goal nuclei.

Associated to Fig 8. (A) Desaturated and inverted fluorescence pictures at 2 totally different rostro-caudal coordinates in diencephalic areas (high and center) and brainstem (backside), displaying MC-RN axons (black arrowheads) at low magnification. Roman numbers enumerate the nuclei proven in (B). (B) Confocal pictures present examples of axons in diencephalic nuclei CM/CL/PC MD, PO, VM, PF, and ZI and in brainstem nuclei, Gi and 7N. Roman numbers point out the nuclei proven in (A). Small sq. field signifies the area chosen for magnification. Insets present a excessive magnification of axons and varicosities (white arrowheads), scale bar = 5 μm. CL, centrolateral nucleus; CM, centro-medial nucleus; Gi, gigantocellular reticular nucleus; MC, motor cortex; MD, mediodorsal nucleus; PC, precentral; PF, parafascicular nucleus; PO, posterior nucleus; RN, recipient neuron; nucleus VM, ventromedial nucleus; ZI, zona incerta; 7N, Facial nucleus.


S8 Fig. LSC-iRN projections to diencephalic areas.

Associated to Fig 8. (A) Desaturated and inverted fluorescence pictures at 3 totally different rostro-caudal coordinates (from left to proper) displaying MC-, BC-, and Bs-iRNs outputs (high to backside). Black arrowheads point out iRN axons. (B) Left: Exemplary desaturated and inverted fluorescence pictures at 2 totally different rostro-caudal coordinates displaying MC-iRNs outputs in diencephalic nuclei (high and backside). Black arrowheads point out axons. Roman numbers enumerate the nuclei proven in excessive magnification. ZI, zona incerta. Proper: Excessive magnification confocal pictures present examples of MC-iRN axons in ETH PF, Po, and ZI. Small sq. field signifies the area chosen for magnification Roman numbers point out the nuclei proven left. Insets present a excessive magnification of axons and varicosities (white arrowheads), inset scale bar = 10 μm. APT, anterior pretectal space; BC, barrel cortex; Bs, brainstem; ETH, ethmoidal nucleus; iRN, inhibitory RN; LSC, lateral SC; MC, motor cortex; MD, mediodorsal nucleus; Pf, parafascicular nucleus; PO, posterior nucleus; RN, recipient neuron; VM, ventromedial nucleus; ZI, zona incerta.


S9 Fig. RNs are confined to the lateral zone of SC.

Associated to Figs 4, 5 and 6. (A) Experimental schematic of trans-synaptic labeling to validate enough unfold of the reporter virus to label a lot of the RN inhabitants within the recipient zone in SC. A cocktail of AAV1-Cre + AAV1-Flpo and reporter AAV8-ConFon-EYFP was injected within the barrel cortex. In SC, 2 totally different reporters fDIO-mCherry and DIO-EGFP have been injected into adjoining areas equivalent to the medial and lateral zone of SC, respectively. (B) SC coronal slice displaying that BC-RNs have been principally labeled with EGFP within the lateral zone and only a few BC-RNs have been labeled by mCherry within the medial zone. BC, barrel cortex; RN, recipient neuron; SC, superior colliculus.


S10 Fig. Negatively modulated clusters within the whisker-sensitive area of the LSC.

Associated to Fig 2. (A) Experimental schematic of whisker airpuff stimulation and silicon probe recording in LSC in awake mice. (B) Abstract from 12 recordings (1,005 items, 8 mice) mapped onto SC outlines by trilateration in CellExplorer [4,5]. Every dot depicts the situation of a unit; colours point out the destructive modulation power upon whisker stimulation (see Supplies and strategies). See primary Fig 2C for modulated items. The info for S10B Fig may be discovered at: . LSC, lateral SC; SC, superior colliculus.


S11 Fig. RNs, iRNs, and ratios, cut up by analyzed brains.

Associated to Fig 5. (A) RN counts per mind per pathway (MC: purple; BC: blue; Bs: purple), imply (dashed line), and normal deviation (gray shaded space). (B) Identical as in (A) however for iRNs. (C) Identical as (A, B) however for the ensuing ratio of iRNs/RNs. The info for S11A-S11C Fig may be discovered at: . BC, barrel cortex; Bs, brainstem; iRN, inhibitory RN; MC, motor cortex; RN, recipient neuron.


S12 Fig. RNs, CVGs, and ratios, cut up by analyzed brains.

Associated to Fig 6. (A) RN counts per mind per pathway (brainstem and cortex: higher panel, purple; and MC and BC: backside panel, blue), means (dashed traces), and normal deviations (gray shaded areas). (B) Identical as in (A) however for CVG-RNs. (C) Identical as (A, B) however for the ensuing ratio of CVGs/RNs. The info for S12A-S12C Fig may be discovered at: . BC, barrel cortex; MC, motor cortex; RN, recipient neuron.



  1. 1.
    Corneil BD, Munoz DP. Overt responses throughout covert orienting. Neuron. 2014;82:1230–1243. pmid:24945769
  2. 2.
    Basso MA, Bickford ME, Cang J. Unraveling circuits of visible notion and cognition by the superior colliculus. Neuron. 2021;109:918–937. pmid:33548173
  3. 3.
    Sherman SM, Usrey WM. Cortical management of conduct and a focus from an evolutionary perspective. Neuron. 2021. pmid:34297915
  4. 4.
    Zingg B, Chou XL, Zhang ZG, Mesik L, Liang F, Tao HW, et al. AAV-Mediated Anterograde Transsynaptic Tagging: Mapping Corticocollicular Enter-Outlined Neural Pathways for Protection Behaviors. Neuron. 2017;93:33–47. pmid:27989459
  5. 5.
    Li Z, Wei J-X, Zhang G-W, Huang JJ, Zingg B, Wang X, et al. Corticostriatal management of protection conduct in mice induced by auditory looming cues. Nat Commun. 2021;12:1040. pmid:33589613
  6. 6.
    Liang F, Xiong XR, Zingg B, Ji X-Y, Zhang LI, Tao HW. Sensory Cortical Management of a Visually Induced Arrest Conduct by way of Corticotectal Projections. Neuron. 2015;86:755–767. pmid:25913860
  7. 7.
    Chou X-L, Wang X, Zhang Z-G, Shen L, Zingg B, Huang J, et al. Inhibitory acquire modulation of protection behaviors by zona incerta. Nat Commun. 2018;9:1151. pmid:29559622
  8. 8.
    Shang C, Liu A, Li D, Xie Z, Chen Z, Huang M, et al. A subcortical excitatory circuit for sensory-triggered predatory looking in mice. Nat Neurosci. 2019;22:909–920. pmid:31127260
  9. 9.
    Catania KC, Hare JF, Campbell KL. Water shrews detect motion, form, and odor to seek out prey underwater. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008;105:571–576. pmid:18184804
  10. 10.
    Brecht M, Naumann R, Anjum F, Wolfe J, Munz M, Mende C, et al. The neurobiology of Etruscan shrew lively contact. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2011;366:3026–3036. pmid:21969684
  11. 11.
    Muthuramalingam M, Bruecker C. Seal and Sea lion Whiskers Detect Slips of Vortices Comparable as Rats Sense Textures. Sci Rep. 2019;9:12808. pmid:31488868
  12. 12.
    Petersen CCH. Sensorimotor processing within the rodent barrel cortex. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2019. pmid:31367018
  13. 13.
    Might PJ. The mammalian superior colliculus: laminar construction and connections. In: Büttner-Ennever JA, editor. Progress in Mind Analysis. Elsevier; 2006. p. 321–378. pmid:16221594
  14. 14.
    Basso MA, Might PJ. Circuits for Motion and Cognition: A View from the Superior Colliculus. Annu Rev Vis Sci. 2017;3:197–226. pmid:28617660
  15. 15.
    Liu X, Huang H, Snutch TP, Cao P, Wang L, Wang F. The Superior Colliculus: Cell Varieties, Connectivity, and Conduct. Neurosci Bull. 2022. pmid:35484472
  16. 16.
    Benavidez NL, Bienkowski MS, Zhu M, Garcia LH, Fayzullina M, Gao L, et al. Group of the inputs and outputs of the mouse superior colliculus. Nat Commun. 2021;12:4004. pmid:34183678
  17. 17.
    Meredith MA, Stein BE. Visible, auditory, and somatosensory convergence on cells in superior colliculus leads to multisensory integration. J Neurophysiol. 1986;56:640–662. pmid:3537225
  18. 18.
    Wallace MT, Meredith MA, Stein BE. Converging influences from visible, auditory, and somatosensory cortices onto output neurons of the superior colliculus. J Neurophysiol. 1993;69:1797–1809. pmid:8350124
  19. 19.
    Kitanishi T, Tashiro M, Kitanishi N, Mizuseki Ok. Intersectional, anterograde transsynaptic concentrating on of neurons receiving monosynaptic inputs from two upstream areas. Commun Biol. 2022;5:149. pmid:35190665
  20. 20.
    Whyland KL, Slusarczyk AS, Bickford ME. GABAergic cell varieties within the superficial layers of the mouse superior colliculus. J Comp Neurol. 2020;528:308–320. pmid:31396959
  21. 21.
    Gharaei S, Arabzadeh E, Solomon SG. Integration of visible and whisker indicators in rat superior colliculus. Sci Rep. 2018;8:16445. pmid:30401871
  22. 22.
    Bezdudnaya T, Castro-Alamancos MA. Superior colliculus cells delicate to lively contact and texture throughout whisking. J Neurophysiol. 2011;106:332–346. pmid:21525369
  23. 23.
    Bezdudnaya T, Castro-Alamancos MA. Neuromodulation of whisking associated neural exercise in superior colliculus. J Neurosci. 2014;34:7683–7695. pmid:24872572
  24. 24.
    Duan CA, Pan Y, Ma G, Zhou T, Zhang S, Xu N-L. A cortico-collicular pathway for motor planning in a memory-dependent perceptual choice activity. Nat Commun. 2021;12:2727. pmid:33976124
  25. 25.
    Castro-Alamancos MA, Favero M. Whisker-related afferents in superior colliculus. J Neurophysiol. 2016;115:2265–2279. pmid:26864754
  26. 26.
    Hemelt ME, Keller A. Superior Colliculus Management of Vibrissa Actions. J Neurophysiol. 2008;100:1245–1254. pmid:18562549
  27. 27.
    Petersen PC, Siegle JH, Steinmetz NA, Mahallati S, Buzsáki G. CellExplorer: A framework for visualizing and characterizing single neurons. Neuron. 2021;109: 3594–3608.e2. pmid:34592168
  28. 28.
    Petersen PC, Berg RW. Lognormal firing fee distribution reveals outstanding fluctuation-driven regime in spinal motor networks. Elife. 2016:5. pmid:27782883
  29. 29.
    Wang Y, Solar Q-Q. An extended-range, recurrent neuronal community linking the emotion areas with the somatic motor cortex. Cell Rep. 2021;36:109733. pmid:34551292
  30. 30.
    Mao T, Kusefoglu D, Hooks BM, Huber D, Petreanu L, Svoboda Ok. Lengthy-range neuronal circuits underlying the interplay between sensory and motor cortex. Neuron. 2011;72:111–123. pmid:21982373
  31. 31.
    Sreenivasan V, Esmaeili V, Kiritani T, Galan Ok, Crochet S, Petersen CCH. Motion Initiation Alerts in Mouse Whisker Motor Cortex. Neuron. 2016;92:1368–1382. pmid:28009277
  32. 32.
    Prasad JA, Carroll BJ, Sherman SM. Layer 5 Corticofugal Projections from Numerous Cortical Areas: Variations on a Sample of Thalamic and Extrathalamic Targets. J Neurosci. 2020;40:5785–5796. pmid:32532890
  33. 33.
    Rojas-Piloni G, Visitor JM, Egger R, Johnson AS, Sakmann B, Oberlaender M. Relationships between construction, in vivo operate and long-range axonal goal of cortical pyramidal tract neurons. Nat Commun. 2017;8:870. pmid:29021587
  34. 34.
    Melzer S, Michael M, Caputi A, Eliava M, Fuchs EC, Whittington MA, et al. Lengthy-range-projecting GABAergic neurons modulate inhibition in hippocampus and entorhinal cortex. Science. 2012;335:1506–1510. pmid:22442486
  35. 35.
    Lohse M, Dahmen JC, Bajo VM, King AJ. Subcortical circuits mediate communication between major sensory cortical areas in mice. Nat Commun. 2021;12:3916. pmid:34168153
  36. 36.
    Xiong XR, Liang F, Zingg B, Ji X-Y, Ibrahim LA, Tao HW, et al. Auditory cortex controls sound-driven innate protection behaviour by corticofugal projections to inferior colliculus. Nat Commun. 2015;6:7224. pmid:26068082
  37. 37.
    Mease RA, Sumser A, Sakmann B, Groh A. Corticothalamic Spike Switch by way of the L5B-POm Pathway in vivo. Cereb Cortex. 2016;26:3461–3475. pmid:27178196
  38. 38.
    Arenkiel BR, Peca J, Davison IG, Feliciano C, Deisseroth Ok, Augustine GJ, et al. In vivo light-induced activation of neural circuitry in transgenic mice expressing channelrhodopsin-2. Neuron. 2007;54:205–218. pmid:17442243
  39. 39.
    Wang X, Chou X-L, Zhang LI, Tao HW. Zona Incerta: An Integrative Node for World Behavioral Modulation. Tendencies Neurosci. 2020;43:82–87. pmid:31864676
  40. 40.
    Kleinfeld D, Ahissar E, Diamond ME. Energetic sensation: insights from the rodent vibrissa sensorimotor system. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2006;16:435–444. pmid:16837190
  41. 41.
    Mitchinson B, Martin CJ, Grant RA, Prescott TJ. Suggestions management in lively sensing: rat exploratory whisking is modulated by environmental contact. Proc Biol Sci. 2007;274:1035–1041. pmid:17331893
  42. 42.
    Hoogland PV, Welker E, Van der Loos H. Group of the projections from barrel cortex to thalamus in mice studied with Phaseolus vulgaris-leucoagglutinin and HRP. Exp Mind Res. 1987;68:73–87. pmid:2826209
  43. 43.
    Groh A, de Kock CPJ, Wimmer VC, Sakmann B, Kuner T. Driver or coincidence detector: modal change of a corticothalamic big synapse managed by spontaneous exercise and short-term melancholy. J Neurosci. 2008;28:9652–9663. pmid:18815251
  44. 44.
    Sumser A, Mease RA, Sakmann B, Groh A. Group and somatotopy of corticothalamic projections from L5B in mouse barrel cortex. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017;114:8853–8858. pmid:28774955
  45. 45.
    Petty GH, Kinnischtzke AK, Hong YK, Bruno RM. Results of arousal and motion on secondary somatosensory and visible thalamus. Elife. 2021:10. pmid:34842139
  46. 46.
    Feig S, Harting JK. Ultrastructural research of the primate parabigeminal nucleus: electron microscopic autoradiographic evaluation of the tectoparabigeminal projection in Galago crassicaudatus. Mind Res. 1992;595:334–338. pmid:1467974
  47. 47.
    Hofbauer A, Holländer H. Synaptic connections of cortical and retinal terminals within the superior colliculus of the rabbit: an electron microscopic double labelling examine. Exp Mind Res. 1986;65:145–155. pmid:3803500
  48. 48.
    Ford JM, Mathalon DH. Efference Copy, Corollary Discharge, Predictive Coding, and Psychosis. Biol Psychiatry Cogn Neurosci Neuroimaging. 2019;4:764–767. pmid:31495399
  49. 49.
    Cavanaugh J, Berman RA, Joiner WM, Wurtz RH. Saccadic Corollary Discharge Underlies Steady Visible Notion. J Neurosci. 2016;36:31–42. pmid:26740647
  50. 50.
    Matyas F, Sreenivasan V, Marbach F, Wacongne C, Barsy B, Mateo C, et al. Motor management by sensory cortex. Science. 2010;330:1240–1243. pmid:21109671
  51. 51.
    Halassa MM, Acsady L. Thalamic Inhibition: Numerous Sources, Numerous Scales. Tendencies Neurosci. 2016;39:680–693. pmid:27589879
  52. 52.
    Ahissar E, Assa E. Notion as a closed-loop convergence course of. Elife. 2016:5. pmid:27159238
  53. 53.
    Tamamaki N, Yanagawa Y, Tomioka R, Miyazaki J-I, Obata Ok, Kaneko T. Inexperienced fluorescent protein expression and colocalization with calretinin, parvalbumin, and somatostatin within the GAD67-GFP knock-in mouse. J Comp Neurol. 2003;467:60–79. pmid:14574680
  54. 54.
    Gong S, Doughty M, Harbaugh CR, Cummins A, Hatten ME, Heintz N, et al. Concentrating on Cre recombinase to particular neuron populations with bacterial synthetic chromosome constructs. J Neurosci. 2007;27:9817–9823. pmid:17855595
  55. 55.
    Madisen L, Zwingman TA, Sunkin SM, Oh SW, Zariwala HA, Gu H, et al. A sturdy and high-throughput Cre reporting and characterization system for the entire mouse mind. Nat Neurosci. 2010;13:133–140. pmid:20023653
  56. 56.
    Mukherjee A, Bajwa N, Lam NH, Porrero C, Clasca F, Halassa MM. Variation of connectivity throughout exemplar sensory and associative thalamocortical loops within the mouse. Elife. 2020:9. pmid:33103997
  57. 57.
    Zingg B, Peng B, Huang J, Tao HW, Zhang LI. Synaptic Specificity and Utility of Anterograde Transsynaptic AAV for Probing Neural Circuitry. J Neurosci. 2020;40:3250–3267. pmid:32198185
  58. 58.
    Fenno LE, Mattis J, Ramakrishnan C, Hyun M, Lee SY, He M, et al. Concentrating on cells with single vectors utilizing multiple-feature Boolean logic. Nat Strategies. 2014;11:763–772. pmid:24908100
  59. 59.
    Paxinos G, Franklin KBJ. Paxinos and Franklin’s the Mouse Mind in Stereotaxic Coordinates. Tutorial Press; 2019. Obtainable from:
  60. 60.
    Heiney SA, Wohl MP, Chettih SN, Ruffolo LI, Medina JF. Cerebellar-dependent expression of motor studying throughout eyeblink conditioning in head-fixed mice. J Neurosci. 2014;34:14845–14853. pmid:25378152
  61. 61.
    Lopes G, Bonacchi N, Frazão J, Neto JP, Atallah BV, Soares S, et al. Bonsai: an event-based framework for processing and controlling information streams. Entrance Neuroinform. 2015;9:7. pmid:25904861
  62. 62.
    Steinmetz NA, Aydin C, Lebedeva A, Okun M, Pachitariu M, Bauza M, et al. Neuropixels 2.0: A miniaturized high-density probe for secure, long-term mind recordings. Science. 2021;372(6539):eabf4588. pmid:33859006
  63. 63.
    Kirchgessner MA, Franklin AD, Callaway EM. Distinct “driving” versus “modulatory” influences of various visible corticothalamic pathways. Curr Biol. 2021;31:5121–5137.e7. pmid:34614389
  64. 64.
    Sofroniew NJ, Vlasov YA, Hires SA, Freeman J, Svoboda Ok. Neural coding in barrel cortex throughout whisker-guided locomotion. Elife. 2015:4. pmid:26701910

Related Articles


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Latest Articles